That does sound like HbA1c. In the current units (mmol/mol) that's 86, and the level chosen to indicate diabetes is 48.I was told this was 10% and fairly high.
Many thanks for this. Gliclazide is only a short term measure I believe. I'm very interested in the eye problem. I have had issues with my eyes and had had an increase in my contact lens strength just before my diagnosis. This has virtually reversed as my bg levels have fallen and I have had to revert to my old lenses.Hiya! Welcome to the forum - there's a lot to get your head round at first but there is so much support on here. The secret to success is lots of little changes over time - if you bring your numbers down too rapidly, you risk causing real damage to fine blood vessels esp in your eyes.
Keeping an honest food diary is a great start and testing your BGs around meals will help you navigate your particular version of diabetes - cos we're all different!
I will add to the above that, if you decide to take a low carb approach to manage weight loss and your BGs, this also has implications with gliclazide so do discuss it with your GP/team before making radical changes to diet.
Oh bless you - I hope you haven't wasted too much money. Your GP should be referring you for a retinopathy appointment which will indicate one way offer the other if there is any damage.Many thanks for this. Gliclazide is only a short term measure I believe. I'm very interested in the eye problem. I have had issues with my eyes and had had an increase in my contact lens strength just before my diagnosis. This has virtually reversed as my bg levels have fallen and I have had to revert to my old lenses.