Donald
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 2
Hmm not sure if this will work
http://mail.dailymail.co.uk/go.asp?/bDML001/mA9IBO/qS9ITO/u6B2H4/x5DO1F2
http://mail.dailymail.co.uk/go.asp?/bDML001/mA9IBO/qS9ITO/u6B2H4/x5DO1F2
Hmm not sure if this will work
http://mail.dailymail.co.uk/go.asp?/bDML001/mA9IBO/qS9ITO/u6B2H4/x5DO1F2
It won't work Donald. Much as I have had the odd negative word to say about some receptionists, the idea that you could set up some sort of National system for this is nonsense. I have decades of experience of computer systems and know that a good, efficient system on this scale is a pipe-dream. There is no existing government-implemented system that works properly and this is a very important issue here - people's health!
I do wish that the people who think up these things would get real and understand that economies of scale sometimes have a limit and for some tasks human beings with specific, local knowledge are truly necessary - it can't all be scripted!
When I make an appointment to see a doctor, I make it to see a specific doctor, who I trust and feel comfortable with, not someone who happens to come top of the list on a computer screen - there are at least two doctors at my local surgery that I would NOT want to see.
A half-baked idea if I've ever seen one!
It would be a false 'economy' even if it did save money (which I strongly doubt).
We get more help and information from our receptionists than we do from the doctors. Our doctors all seem to be overbooked, so the receptionists are able to offer alternatives (the nurse or NHS Direct) if it's urgent. You don't get that from a computer.
The Government has been forced into a humiliating climbdown over plans backed by the Department of Health for all GP patient appointments to be handled by national or regional call centres.
Pulse broke the news yesterday that under radical proposals to slash ?600m off NHS spending, NHS managers had urged GPs to axe their entire back-office teams, with potentially tens of thousands of staff being made redundant.
However, today the Department of Health, which had originally applauded the report, went into rapid reverse gear, saying it had ?no plans to pursue the idea?.
Pulse readers had reacted with outrage to the proposals, which were hailed yesterday by the DH?s national director for improvement and efficiency, Jim Easton, as ?just one example of how the service is taking the lead in identifying where they can make best use of resources for the benefit of patients, as well as the taxpayer.'
Pulse received a record level of feedback on the story, with more than 130 commenters almost unanimously opposed to the plans. The story also attracted widespread national coverage, with Tony Spotswood, chief executive of Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and chair of the review group which wrote the report, appearing on Radio 4's Today programme this morning to explain the proposals.
Thank goodness the idea has been dropped. the receptionists are a very important part of the team and the ones at my practice are very good. They know their patients and who genuinely needs to be seen and who is a regular timewaster. Anyway, as it's been dropped I will end my rant there!!