@HalfpipMarathon - if you really want to delete your account then you need to tag
@everydayupsanddowns and he will sort it but please, please do not even think of it.
One of the reasons for not offering blood glucose measurement to all is that for some, using it, might cause anxiety. The way I think about it is that if it causes anxiety, then it's because nobody has taken the time to explain how it works and what is the best way to use the information. That's where we can help - and if you do not keep asking your questions you will not get any further forward. We don't mind the questions.
If you get to the basics, you have to separate T1 from T2 when you come to using blood glucose measurement whether you do it by finger pricking or with some fancy continuous monitor. Insulin users use the information to make short term decisions, basically how much insulin is needed at any particular time. Decisions are made and the effect is seen within an hour and further changes and corrections can be made straight away if needed.
That simply does not apply to T2's who do not use insulin. For those, the timescales are quite different. You decide to change something and then over a longer time period use monitoring to see whether the change has been for the good or not. If it has, then keep it, if it has not then try something else. You are looking for what happens over the next few weeks or even months, not what happens in the next hour or two.
I'm going to say something that I know some will disagree with and that is that CGM can overcomplicate things when thinking about T2 management. When looking for trends over the medium and long term, you do not need something that gives instantaneous readings. It's made worse when the whole thing is a bit of a faff and the tech is a little "flaky". The benefits for the insulin user offset the problems but I do not think that is the case for the non insulin user. Yes, you can envisage situations where it could be of value, for example, when trying to sort out what is going on in atypical presentations but other than that I am not sure. I'm a bit of a measurement and data nerd and would not consider using CGM. I can get perfectly adequate data from finger pricking and good record keeping as a means of keeping on top of things and with CGM I would spend too much time trying to work out how good the numbers were rather than using the information to do something.
I would no doubt think differently if
reliable non-invasive wearable CGM became available. Despite the hype, I don't think that will happen for some time soon.