Does nobody remember that there was a trial in the 1970s to stay on summertime all year round, which was declared a disaster after 2 or 3 years and hence the clock changes were brought back in? So my mum tells me, I would have been too small to know!
1968-1971, apparently. (Rather too long ago for me, too.)
From
https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP93-111/RP93-111.pdf
The Government gave an undertaking that a comprehensive review would be carried out before any decision was taken at the end of the BST experiment. The White Paper which followed in 1970 (Cmnd 4512, Review of British Standard Time) pointed out that it was impossible to quantify advantages and disadvantages and that a final decision would need to rest largely on a qualitative decision.
The issue was debated in the Commons on 2 December 1970 and by a vote of 366 to 81 the British Standard Time experiment was discontinued. It has since been alleged by groups in favour of change that the outcome of this vote was affected by powerful lobbying by farmers, the building industry and the Scots, who had overwhelmed a "silent majority". It has also been alleged that this lobbying was helped by the Press, who had produced on their front pages "lurid photographs of a few children injured on the way to school in the dark" [2].
There's a later comment
The DoT Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL) produced the report The Potential Effect on Road Casualties of [CET/SDST], in 1989 [17]. This considered data from the winters between 1968 and 1971 during the BST experiment. It also took into account the fact that overall casualty data had fallen between 1971 and 1989, and other factors such as traffic practices, lighting conditions and travel patterns which had changed, or which would change, under CET.
Analyses after the BST experiment indicated that it had been effective in reducing road traffic casualties.
More people were injured in the darker mornings, but fewer people were injured in the lighter afternoons. Throughout the year there are always more people injured in the late afternoon than in the morning, so the saving in the afternoons more than compensated for the increase in the mornings. This meant that there was a net reduction in casualties [17].