Crowded buses and trains: it's the stark new image of Britain's class divide

Status
Not open for further replies.

Northerner

Admin (Retired)
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
Of all the political slogans to make an unexpected comeback, Norman Tebbit’s “On yer bike” must be one of the most unlikely. When the then employment secretary told the 1981 Conservative party conference that, in the 1930s, his jobless father hadn’t rioted but had rather “got on his bike and looked for work”, he delighted delegates but outraged many of the hundreds of thousands of newly unemployed for whom there was no work to be found.

But now workers are once again being encouraged to get on their bikes, or walk, to get to work. In his address to the nation on Sunday night, Boris Johnson urged: “You should go to work if you can’t work from home.” And because social distancing cannot be guaranteed on buses and trains, he added: “If possible do so by car or even better by walking or bicycle.”

Today was the official back-to-work day. But, surprise, the prime minister’s advice has been ignored – and widely shared pictures show crowded buses, trains and the London underground. Who knew? People on lower incomes, who do not own a car or who live several miles from their workplace, cannot walk or ride a bike to get to work. They need public transport, as city planners have known for well over a century.


That went well 🙄 This will no doubt make it harder for essential workers and put them at greater risk :( My personal view is that we entered lockdown late and have started to leave it too early :( Despite assurances by the government that these are 'baby steps', the consequences are beginning to look more like major risks for an increase in infections and a second wave :(
 
Last edited:
I'm beginning to think that this government could not even manage to run a corner shop successfully - lack of ordering, no forward planning nor attention to sell by dates nor stock control and can't even devise a logical and safe method of opening up for business.
 
Yes drummer, couldn't even run a chip shop, where there are only half a dozen product lines and only open at tea time.
 
You were allowed to go to work before though, if you couldn’t do your job from home, what's different?
 
You were allowed to go to work before though, if you couldn’t do your job from home, what's different?

I think the only change is that now you're allowed to use public transport if you need to (previously I think you were really not supposed to unless you were an essential worker).

But you're right, formally there's not much change; I think more people stayed at home (not working) than they were expecting. But they can't say that (that would be conceding an error) so they have to combine it with some extra (marginal) changes and pretend it's all part of a plan.
 
There are a lot of office-based jobs that would be perfectly possible to do 99% from home - but seriously - who wants to do that? We didn't buy (or rent) our homes for the convenience of our employer! Plus shedloads have restrictive covenants in the deeds preventing folk from carrying on businesses there, and household insurance policies don't include business use. It's complicated - are they going to supply a separate electricity supply and meter, separate broadband and router, ditto telephone, rent office space with use of facilities from you - or what?

Surely for your own mental health - it's best to keep work and home separate?
 
Boris can't imagine life outside the M25. So when his decisions come back to bite him - those crowded buses and trains will undoubtedly cause a spike in London infections and even more deaths- full lockdown will be reimposed. Rember, this easing was his decision, and was made contrary to SAGE advice. Wales, Northern Ireland and and Scotland are following the scientific advice in maintaining full lockdown.

That's just a heads up to spot the lies he will will think up to account for a spike in infections. It won't be his fault, for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top