Amigo
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 2
My very elderly mum is in hospital presently and is type 2 diabetic, very well controlled and on metformin. Today I went in to help her with her meal (which staff had chosen) and it was corned beef hash with sliced potatoes and mashed potatoes with gravy followed by sweet rice pudding. A veritable carb feast!
It's clear that hospital staff don't concern themselves greatly, particularly with elderly diabetics who are not presenting with errant or erratic BG's in hospital. From discussions on here, it's clear that a lack of nutritional understanding in hospital can extend to all age groups and as patients self select, few checks are made. Hopefully it would be different if her BG's were massively out of range and causing problems.
It got me thinking really. At what point is it reasonable to intervene? Staff seem to think it's crazy trying to prevent very elderly people from indulging in treats by the time they are in their late 80's and indeed 90's. Is maintaining optimum health and depriving people at the end of their life even reasonable?
In truth I'd be reluctant now to insist my mum was deprived a dessert or a piece of cake but this meal lacked nutritional balance...e.g. no vegetables at all. She still needs the right nutrition to get better.
My mum has no mobility and has lost her sight (not diabetic related) so what argument is there for complaining about non diabetic choices? I can see both sides of the argument but part of me says people of this very advanced age are more likely to die of boredom than a custard slice!
Am I wrong in thinking this? I sense it's the prevailing attitude in residential care Homes.
It's clear that hospital staff don't concern themselves greatly, particularly with elderly diabetics who are not presenting with errant or erratic BG's in hospital. From discussions on here, it's clear that a lack of nutritional understanding in hospital can extend to all age groups and as patients self select, few checks are made. Hopefully it would be different if her BG's were massively out of range and causing problems.
It got me thinking really. At what point is it reasonable to intervene? Staff seem to think it's crazy trying to prevent very elderly people from indulging in treats by the time they are in their late 80's and indeed 90's. Is maintaining optimum health and depriving people at the end of their life even reasonable?
In truth I'd be reluctant now to insist my mum was deprived a dessert or a piece of cake but this meal lacked nutritional balance...e.g. no vegetables at all. She still needs the right nutrition to get better.
My mum has no mobility and has lost her sight (not diabetic related) so what argument is there for complaining about non diabetic choices? I can see both sides of the argument but part of me says people of this very advanced age are more likely to die of boredom than a custard slice!
Am I wrong in thinking this? I sense it's the prevailing attitude in residential care Homes.