I also wondered whether it would be distracting and whether it is legal.Why would you want that?....something else thats distracting whilst your supposed to be concentrating on driving
This looks like a step in the right direction. But I wouldn’t want that much onscreen information? Maybe just a widget or unobtrusive readout of current levels displayed. My understanding of the law is regarding flash monitoring whilst driving, which probably comes under hand held devices used whilst at the wheel. Where as this is a hands free readout.Hi All, If you have an in car display unit , there is now an app for android auto that shows your levels whilst driving .
View attachment 33989
Similar principle to what can be done with a Wear OS smartwatch.This is brilliant, I had no idea you could do this!
I’ve done this on my phone with Juggluco, too. There are aftermarket double din Android car radios that can replace the “standard” in older cars. But I could never justify the outlay for such a unit, myself.Juggluco will generate an overlay with just a single number iirc - I don't have a car that's modern enough to have something to display it on mind you so I've only tested on my phone 🙂
If you were above 5mmol/l for at least 45 minutes after the hypo, before you drove, then yes you were fine. The example given that @trophywench was commenting on, if the person was driving while that screen was displaying, then they were behind the wheel less than 45 mintues after returning to at least 5mmol/l, so I hope they were stationary and sitting in the passenger seat.
No.
OK? Firstly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the picture featured with the “smart radio” was a mock up, “photoshop”? (A little thoughtless to our trained eye.) I would also wager smart radios don’t need a “screenshot” function? secondly; hopefully the driver like me keeps a meter handy. Sensors lag on hypo recovery regarding the reading of interstitial fluid compared to blood testing. The imaginary driver could have been back in range according to the meter by 18.05? Granted, it’s a very narrow time margin on the radio screen depiction. I’m personally well awair of procedures with hypoglycaemia’s. Edit to add; I could actually be representing someone’s kid in the back seat?If you were above 5mmol/l for at least 45 minutes after the hypo, before you drove, then yes you were fine. The example given that @trophywench was commenting on, if the person was driving while that screen was displaying, then they were behind the wheel less than 45 mintues after returning to at least 5mmol/l, so I hope they were stationary and sitting in the passenger seat.
View attachment 34009
Back to the tech on the “boom box” eh? 🙂No.
Unless you were doing as @Robin stated.
Probably one or two glucose tab's when you saw the downward trend would save all these type of questions, no disrespect intended.
Some may be aware of my thoughts on 5 to drive in other threads, personally my low alarm set at 5.6, aim to be driving between 6-11 with a horizontal arrow depending distance and types of road.
But that's just my preference.
Oh I’m sure it was. Just a bit of light hearted conjecture on our part, like we are always amused at a library picture that kept being used by journalists a while ago, of someone injecting into a vein in the crook of their arm every time there was a mention of insulin.OK? Firstly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the picture featured with the “smart radio” was a mock up, “photoshop”
One day it will be a safety feature on Teslas. Hit “5.6mmol” & the car stops? 😉Oh I’m sure it was. Just a bit of light hearted conjecture on our part, like we are always amused at a library picture that kept being used by journalists a while ago, of someone injecting into a vein in the crook of their arm every time there was a mention of insulin.
The person whose Libre graph is shown should not be driving at 18.49, having been hypo (under 3.0!!) less than an hour ago