SB2015
Well-Known Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
I was involved in a recent event about the different tech available to us to manage our Diabetes.
I had a dawning realisation. I was aware that my driver for seeing better and better results stemmed from a DSN at the start saying
'Just keep between 4 and 7 and you will be fine'. Looking back now I realise that this was in the time before any sensors and she was referring to the finger pricks tests which we did just before meals. Not an unreasonable target and one that I achieved a lot of the time. When I moved to a pump things got better and I achieved even better premeal results.
However then came sensors ...
When I started using the Libre I was then able to see what was happening with the after meal levels and those spikes, but carried the target of 4-7 in my head too. I was persuaded to broaden the target to 4 - 10, but then expected myself to be in that range 100% of the time. I was determined, good at maths, tackled the different variables ... I did improve my TIR but drove myself to distraction trying to get to perfection which led to burnout. It took me a long while to accept that perfection was not possible, and to learn to live with my diabetes rather than try to control it (That's one from @helli that is brilliant)
I have often looked back and wondered why they didn't tell me that my targets were impossible.
What I had been set for pre meal targets was possible, but was not going to work all day and certainly not after meals.
I suspect that they did tell me this, but I didn't hear, and more importantly I had carried a target forward from before the tech.
I now stick to TIR: 70% is good, 80% is brilliant, 90% is amazing
The discussions that we had at the recent event very much focused on finding ways of making the various tech work for us to suit our needs.
I had a dawning realisation. I was aware that my driver for seeing better and better results stemmed from a DSN at the start saying
'Just keep between 4 and 7 and you will be fine'. Looking back now I realise that this was in the time before any sensors and she was referring to the finger pricks tests which we did just before meals. Not an unreasonable target and one that I achieved a lot of the time. When I moved to a pump things got better and I achieved even better premeal results.
However then came sensors ...
When I started using the Libre I was then able to see what was happening with the after meal levels and those spikes, but carried the target of 4-7 in my head too. I was persuaded to broaden the target to 4 - 10, but then expected myself to be in that range 100% of the time. I was determined, good at maths, tackled the different variables ... I did improve my TIR but drove myself to distraction trying to get to perfection which led to burnout. It took me a long while to accept that perfection was not possible, and to learn to live with my diabetes rather than try to control it (That's one from @helli that is brilliant)
I have often looked back and wondered why they didn't tell me that my targets were impossible.
What I had been set for pre meal targets was possible, but was not going to work all day and certainly not after meals.
I suspect that they did tell me this, but I didn't hear, and more importantly I had carried a target forward from before the tech.
I now stick to TIR: 70% is good, 80% is brilliant, 90% is amazing
The discussions that we had at the recent event very much focused on finding ways of making the various tech work for us to suit our needs.
- Sensors can help us to identify patterns, appropriate portion sizes, some foods that are very spikey for us, how to manage high fat, timings through the day of a pre-bolus, head off highs and lows ...
- Pumps help us to fine tune our basal patterns, make quicker changes through the day to basal patterns more easily, manage exercise more effectively ...
- Looping takes away a lot of the background thinking that we have to do day to day, but we still need to be ready to step in (driverless cars come to mind), and this often needs intervention in the extreme situations.