8-hour time-restricted eating linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular death

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubbleblower

Bubbleblower

Well-Known Member
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1.5 LADA
newsroom.heart.org

8-hour time-restricted eating linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular death

03/19/24 Editor’s note: The research authors have shared their full poster presentation for updated details about their research abstract. Please see the digital file attached, in the right hand column for these details. The most current statistics, ...
newsroom.heart.org newsroom.heart.org

An analysis of over 20,000 U.S. adults from 2003 untill 2018 by the American Heart Association.
The outcome was the opposite of what was expected.

Low muscle mass is linked to higher mortality rates, including a higher risk of dying from heart disease.
 
The research is not peer reviewed and the conclusions doubtful. Personally I regard this right hour window theory fairly dubious. Also in my working life I have noticed that people who miss breakfast perform less well (not peer reviewed). However, there is research that links both car and industrial accidents to missing breakfast. I would suggest a light breakfast like a poached egg on a small slice of toast. Be careful with fruit as some cause BG spikes.
 
I think if you do anything by statistics you can get it to say anything. Remember if you give someone a placebo a lot will actually say it worked better than those that have the actual drug. i think there is proof that everything is bad. You know if you live you will die? You know if you drink water some maybe contaminated. @Lol I guess next bottle of water you may think twice but I am with Mikey Bikey. Just do what you want within reason.
 
MikeyBikey said:
The research is not peer reviewed and the conclusions doubtful. Personally I regard this right hour window theory fairly dubious. Also in my working life I have noticed that people who miss breakfast perform less well (not peer reviewed). However, there is research that links both car and industrial accidents to missing breakfast. I would suggest a light breakfast like a poached egg on a small slice of toast. Be careful with fruit as some cause BG spikes.
Click to expand...
You reminded me of an article I read many years back regarding motor insurance claims. It said that the claims concentrated around the first couple of hours after lunch? Drawing the conclusion that digestion was making drivers less attentive to vehicle operation? (I did read it decades ago.)
 
I don't do fasting but I cannot believe this would be correct. I suppose it could be an issue for someone already anorexic or underweight but not to people who are overweight or normal weight and who would compensate with their meals for the rest of the day.
 
People of my parents generation used to do time restricted eating, only they didn’t call it that, they called it 'Normal life' They had breakfast at 8am, lunch at 1pm, tea at 6pm, and didn’t expect to eat anything before bedtime. That’s how I was brought up. Snacking at all hours is a modern habit. (OK, their hearts stopped beating eventually, but they were both well into their 90s.)
 
Robin said:
People of my parents generation used to do time restricted eating, only they didn’t call it that, they called it 'Normal life' They had breakfast at 8am, lunch at 1pm, tea at 6pm, and didn’t expect to eat anything before bedtime. That’s how I was brought up. Snacking at all hours is a modern habit. (OK, their hearts stopped beating eventually, but they were both well into their 90s.)
Click to expand...
Thats a great age and I guess they would see a bit of the war as children but would have been rationed.
To be honest it is possibly those that really
go on fad diets don't eat enough etc or are trying to slim on an all or nothing .
When i cut out sugar and went very low carb it affected my heart rate and i think if i drank a high sugar drink it would too. Some not all but shakes i looked at are higher in sugar and salt than i would normally cook with.
Surely its common sense.
Your parents would not have ate junk but a fresh wholesome meal no doubt.
Glad they had a long life but you will miss them.
Robin said:
People of my parents generation used to do time restricted eating, only they didn’t call it that, they called it 'Normal life' They had breakfast at 8am, lunch at 1pm, tea at 6pm, and didn’t expect to eat anything before bedtime. That’s how I was brought up. Snacking at all hours is a modern habit. (OK, their hearts stopped beating eventually, but they were both well into their 90s.)
Click to expand...
 
Nayshiftin said:
Thats a great age and I guess they would see a bit of the war as children but would have been rationed.
To be honest it is possibly those that really
go on fad diets don't eat enough etc or are trying to slim on an all or nothing .
When i cut out sugar and went very low carb it affected my heart rate and i think if i drank a high sugar drink it would too. Some not all but shakes i looked at are higher in sugar and salt than i would normally cook with.
Surely its common sense.
Your parents would not have ate junk but a fresh wholesome meal no doubt.
Glad they had a long life but you will miss them.
Click to expand...
My parents were quite old by the time I was born (52 and 43) so they were already adults in the war, father running a business, mother a teacher (both in Coventry, not exactly the best place to be doing either.) I was definitely brought up with no fizzy drinks, no sweets as routine, only as an occasional treat, no crisps except if you went to a party, home cooked food etc etc.
 
Ive never had Breakfast, unless on holiday for some reason a habit we got into, Now i have a glass of full milk 200ml when i wake up thats only because u had trouble eating when i was in hospital and they couldn't give me my insulin in the morning as BG was to low so suggested a glass of milk and its took for the last 6 months, i have lunch, dinner and most evenings a small snack.
 
Robin said:
My parents were quite old by the time I was born (52 and 43) so they were already adults in the war, father running a business, mother a teacher (both in Coventry, not exactly the best place to be doing either.) I was definitely brought up with no fizzy drinks, no sweets as routine, only as an occasional treat, no crisps except if you went to a party, home cooked food etc etc.
Click to expand...
No with the blitz , Coventry was well bombed . Yes I did not think really you said 90
so they would have been in the second war. So yes they coped well. Sugar was rationed and well the crisps and the likes today. It would hVd been salt n shake back then. I worked ar Grooms and leaving one of the houses we had a bottle of schloer n crisos and one lady said fit for a Queen. Times change
 
JITR said:
Should I take this report seriously and start eating breakfast?
Click to expand...

No and yes.
It shows the effect of income most of all, many participants from the TRE<8hrs group are from poor black neighbourhoods, the no breakfast before school category. They could have showed that but chose not to.

The <8hrs group also has the highest BMI so very may be TRE without weightloss doesn’t work.

It reminds me of an item on Dutch TV about poor areas in the UK, like Jaywick, where they have "food deserts" and can’t get any fresh food. With it they showed this graph, “differences in overweight between poor and rich (in the UK)”:

1711051693529.png

The lower the income the higher the percentage overweight people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top