But either way, it makes no difference.
If it's caused by DP, then there isn't enough circulating insulin to meet her blood sugar requirements.
If it's her basal insulin running out, then there isn't circulating insulin to meet her blood sugar requirements.
Either way, the treatment regime is broadly the same.
Testing throughout the night will help to understand whether it is DP or LA running out and the specific timing of this is paramount so the more tests the more information is provided. If its DP there may be a need for a pump - if LA there may be a need to alter the timings - so it is important and will make a difference to treatment.🙂
Where on earth is this statistic that 2 teenagers die in their sleep each week from nighttime hypoglycaemia? DUK. That is a heck of a lot of people. I am not in the slightest disputing that people can and do die in their sleep from hypos but every report I have ever read about when this happens always either seems to include alcohol or happens in an individual with a history of going in and out of hospital for both DKA and hypoglycaemic collapse. Obviously no-one should ever rely on their liver alone to save them from nighttime hypoglycaemia. This is the point I was trying to make - saying that the liver 'saves' people is not always an accurate reflection of what actually happens as this ability is mostly lost the longer one has diabetes. Obviously everyone should work to ensure that they avoid it. But do you not agree that we should consider the possibility that liver dumps can and do happen and that this might be the cause of elevated blood sugar in the OP in the morning? I'm not saying it isn't DP or basal running out; I'm saying let's consider all the options instead of just blithely assuming one of these options isn't an option. The best paediatric teams in the UK do not believe in somoghyi. If it existed why would Medtronic have made the VEO that cuts out if levels automatically rise?
In any case, citing a report from 1984, before we had modern insulins or even modern blood sugar testing methods, is hardly compelling proof that the Somogyi effect cannot possibly happen. Particularly when you follow the links to the right of the page which lead to more recent reports which suggest the Somogyi effect definitely exists! As the parent of a child who uses full-time CGMS it is clear to me that somogyi does not happen - at best levels will rise to 9ish - but not the 18's that is reported. There are hundreds of children on CGM's on the CWD list and their data shows no such effect either - we cant all be wrong?! The somogyi was named after its founder in 1938 and has not actually been proven with any studies to happen - the latest data does not support it.
But why bother? You don't need to know what your BG is doing every minute of the night. You test before you go to bed, you test in the middle of the night, you test in the morning. That'll show you in the first instance if your BG is going up or down as a general trend. For instance, if you go to bed at 11pm at 6.5, a 3am test shows your BG is also 6.0, but then your morning at 8am is 18.0, then clearly something happens between 3 and 8am. So the next night you can then test at say 4am. Then you might find your BG is at 4.1...and you can infer a hypo must probably be taking place. Or perhaps it's at 12 - in which case it's either DP or the basal running out. Yes, a CGMS will give a more complete picture but given the option of either waiting for the clinic to sort this out, or just having a couple of nights of interrupted sleep, I'd take the interrupted sleep quicker option every time.