I've had a look at the table, but my observation is that some conditions are plain horrible and some more or less horrible than that, BUT the individual makes a huge difference.
For example, I have a friend I have often cited on here. A former T1 who has undergone two Yes, two) kidney transplants. The reason the first failed was the medics assumed her kidney failure was due to her T1, when it was not. It stemmed from another condition which was not diagnosed or even investigated until the first transplant failed and she headed back to dialysis.
She has other conditions, but has recently been diagnosed with Parkinson's in her early 60's. Her attitude to that? "Well, at least I'm not the age Michael J Fox or others were when diagnosed." Her mobility is now impacted, that compounded by the earlier loss of a couple of toes through her periods of dialysis.
She is a total inspiration of positivity. She's holding off going for a Blue Badge, "until she feels she REALLY needs it", swims a couple of times a week, does Tai Chi, sings in a choir and is my hero.
How anyone deals with any codition will impact their outcomes, at least to an extent. I feel people, when diagnosed with a long term condition either learn to live with it, and live their best lives with their hand of cards, or they become the condition and it rules their lives and likely, in my view, makes less good outcomes and quality of life more likely.
The world seem obsessed with labels and categories, and they aren't always helpful. Nobody should be kept in the dark about their condition. Quite the opposite, but buying into all the bad stuff and potential bad stuff isn't always helpful.
Be clear, this post is about nobody on this forum, but my observation of life in general, as I gather miles on life's clock.