Come on everybody, cool it down.
At the heart of this debate there is a dilemma. The notion that there may be downsides to vaccination have validity. The notion that there are downsides to not being vaccinated also have validity. It's a matter of argument, opinion, prejudice and a lot of other things which determine where any individual arrives at when considering their own approach to the issue.
The one thing you can be sure of in this sort of debate is that it is easier to create discourse than consensus.
Personally I wish that people would talk about balance of risk in this sort of matter rather than treating every thing as if it can only be good or bad. My own view is that the balance of risk is in favour of vaccination even if the validation of the vaccine has been rushed. The balance of risk is against controlling the virus by trying to prevent transmission by legislation. The 100,000 dead, unknown numbers with prolonged effects and the rate at which it is being transmitted lead me to that view.
That's my assessment and I'll behave accordingly. I've had the first vaccination but will continue to take care with social contact in all its forms. Yes, I'm hedging my bets and anyway in the event I get asymptomatic covid because the big benefit of vaccination may be simply to reduce the symptoms, I don't want to pass it on to anybody who has yet to be vaccinated or has decided that vaccination is not right for them.