I'm a bit confused by a conversation I've just had with my DN.
I've been diagnosed Type 1 because the treatment for Type 2 didn't seem to work at bringing down my BG levels and keeping them low.
They took blood samples which went to Exeter to confirm Type 1 but all tests came back negative.
My DN still wants to treat me as Type 1 and says that the results are very inaccurate especially in older people (50+).
I don't really know what to make of this.
Has anyone else had this sort of result and are the tests really as unreliable as that?
Could I actually be a misdiagnosed Type 2 ?
I'll email my GP to get her view but wanted to see what people on here thought.
I've been diagnosed Type 1 because the treatment for Type 2 didn't seem to work at bringing down my BG levels and keeping them low.
They took blood samples which went to Exeter to confirm Type 1 but all tests came back negative.
My DN still wants to treat me as Type 1 and says that the results are very inaccurate especially in older people (50+).
I don't really know what to make of this.
Has anyone else had this sort of result and are the tests really as unreliable as that?
Could I actually be a misdiagnosed Type 2 ?
I'll email my GP to get her view but wanted to see what people on here thought.