• Please Remember: Members are only permitted to share their own experiences. Members are not qualified to give medical advice. Additionally, everyone manages their health differently. Please be respectful of other people's opinions about their own diabetes management.
  • We seem to be having technical difficulties with new user accounts. If you are trying to register please check your Spam or Junk folder for your confirmation email. If you still haven't received a confirmation email, please reach out to our support inbox: support.forum@diabetes.org.uk

The Great Cholesterol Con ? Dr Malcolm Kendrick

Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.

Northerner

Admin (Retired)
Relationship to Diabetes
Type 1
When I was diagnosed with diabetes I was immediately put on a course of statin treatment (Simvastatin 40mg) in an attempt to lower my cholesterol levels. After 6 weeks of treatment my total cholesterol level was measured at 2.4 mmol/l. The nurse told me that it was ‘the lowest she’d ever seen’, my GP gave a sharp intake of breath and said ‘that’s excellent’! Needless to say, I was very pleased and felt rather smug! The best they’d ever seen! Now, however, I no longer believe this to be true.

In a very readable, humorous style, Dr Kendrick evaluates the cholesterol hypothesis from its origins, when it was thought that dietary cholesterol was the major risk factor to cardiovascular health, to later and current thinking whereupon cholesterol has been subdivided into ‘good’ (HDL) and ‘bad’ (LDL) cholesterol. The history and interpretation of all the major studies of the role of elevated cholesterol levels in heart disease is described, with their flaws and inconsistencies exposed. Determined to prove that high cholesterol, particularly LDL, contributes significantly to diminished life expectancy amongst populations, the cholesterol hypothesis is constantly adapted to overcome contradictory findings. Then come the statins – a multi-billion dollar industry with pharmaceutical giants (who, incidentally fund the vast majority of research into the efficacy of statins amongst other drug therapies) fighting a battle on all fronts to convince all and everyone that these wonder drugs will lead to longer, and healthier lives. Furthermore, GPs are keen to prescribe statins as they are rewarded for achieving reduced levels of cholesterol in their patients.

Dr Kendrick does not deny that, in those with a history of heart disease, life expectancy can be increased. However, by explaining the way that statistics are manipulated he exposes the truth: 10 million high risk people taking statins for a year may increase their lifespan by, on average, two days. Furthermore, studies have shown that having too LOW a level of cholesterol may actually contribute to strokes, plus there are many potential side-effects of the drugs that are not yet known because they have not been in use long enough. There are concerns that they could lead to increases in certain cancers, plus are also thought to be responsible for muscle and joint deterioration and even, paradoxically, to heart failure!

If you are taking statins then I would urge you to read this book, alongside others to obtain a balanced view, and decide whether you are taking unnecessary risks with your future health.

The Great Cholesterol Con amazon link
 
Last edited:
Have just finished reading this book on my Tablet (?1.70 from Amazon Kindle version). Great read and fascinating.
 
Have just finished reading this book on my Tablet (?1.70 from Amazon Kindle version). Great read and fascinating.

I wish all books on kindle were that cheap! I just looked for Ben Goldacre's Bad Pharma and it's ?2 more than the print version on Kindle!
 
I was put on Simvastatin. But now off them because they where doing my knee joints inn. And have never had cholestrol problems
 
This is scary. I have little faith in statins and hate the battle at the surgery with doctor/nurse who persistently try to prescribe them. The more I read on the subject, the more worried I become.
 
i was put on statins (reluctantly) years ago - even though my overall level was only 5.5 (and both the 'good' and 'bad' levels were well within the ranges they should be).

When I questioned this, I was advised that is was a 'preventative' measure. Being on tablets for PCOS, insulin resistance and 'preventative' high blood pressure (as well as the injections!) I was keen to not take any more meds than necessary (given I was only late 20's at the time).

I questioned the use of the Benecol products with my diabetes consultant and was met with a brick wall 'well you'd need to get your GPs agreement, we won't comment'. Knowing that my GP would simply defer to the diabetes clinic (and thus recommend against stopping), I took it upon myself to stop taking them and cleverly arranged things so I'd have a fasting blood test taken after 3 months of my self imposed trial period of using Benecol products.

The result? after 3 months, my overall cholesterol level was LOWER taking the benecol products than it had been when taknig the statins (with respective lower levels of both 'good' and 'bad' levels). I confronted my clinic and admitted the trial I'd done, needless to say they went very quiet and sheepishly admitted that maybe I could swap the statins for the benecols.....
 
Errr - did they enquire if you had a boyfriend before giving you the statins?

As they aren't supposed to be prescribed to anyone who has even the slightest chance of getting preg, since they definitely cause foetal abnormalities.

I hate em with a passion.
 
well, they asked if i was planning on getting pregnant, and ask that at every review i have, makes it all very regimental!
 
Read it as well - worth a look

I read it as well. Seemed pretty thorough and presented an alternative hypothesis for heart disease.🙂
 
Status
This thread is now closed. Please contact Anna DUK, Ieva DUK or everydayupsanddowns if you would like it re-opened.
Back
Top