For those who have taken Sitagliptin, I am wondering how long it took to have an effect and what side effects people have experienced?
As detailed on another thread, I had been on 80mg Gliclaizde and 2g Metformin since diagnosis, but earlier this year the Gliclazide just stopped working. I increased dose until trying the maximum of 320mg, all without any difference to my levels. I spoke to the surgery pharmacist who added 100mg Sitagliptin to my prescription whilst keeping Gliclazide at 320mg. I think they misunderstood me as saying that the Gliclazide alone was not enough, but I wanted to see if it helps anyway.
I started Sitagliptin Sunday without Gliclazide. This is both see what effect the new medication has itself, and because if the two helped each other then I could gradually add Gliclazide to avoid hypos from starting on the maximum dose.
However last night I did not sleep well, feeling very nauseous. Though today has been better, I have still felt generally unwell with moments of nausea. I feel sure this because of the medication as, having been shielding since the lockdown started, it cannot be anything someone passed to me.
Because nausea is listed as a common side effect, I was wondering whether anyone with experience of it can say whether this is a permanent or one that goes away after an initial period? And does it normally occur when taken alongside Gliclazide? The information leaflet lists side effects for different combinations, but nausea is only lasted for when taken with Metformin, it is not included in the section where it is taken with a sulphonylurea as well.
And despite it initially seeming like it was having an effect, I was back to the now usual higher levels yesterday evening and today. So maybe the improved readings may have been just normal random variance, and the lower level on Monday evening seems more than I would have expected from this medication alone. Is it too early to expect to see any consistent benefit yet?
These are my readings from the past ten days for first thing in the morning and before an evening meal, the latter usually after fasting for around five hours:
Apr 20: 13.3 / 13.7 ** After having taken 320mg Gliclazide & 2g Metformin
Apr 21: 14.8 / 15.9
Apr 22: 15.6 / 14.3
Apr 23: 16.4 / 15.6
Apr 24: 13.6 / 17.9 ** After having taken just 2g Metformin
Apr 25: 14.3 / 11.7
Apr 26: 14.2 / 20.9
Apr 27: 12.7 / 6.9 ** After having taken 100mg Sitagliptin & 2g Metformin
Apr 28: 10.1 / 17.7
Apr 29: 17.5 / 18.1
That is pretty similar to how it has been for a while regardless of medication. There have been occasional single figure readings as I had on Monday evening, but these are uncommon. So thankfully have been highs much worse than the one on Sunday evening.
Thank you.
As detailed on another thread, I had been on 80mg Gliclaizde and 2g Metformin since diagnosis, but earlier this year the Gliclazide just stopped working. I increased dose until trying the maximum of 320mg, all without any difference to my levels. I spoke to the surgery pharmacist who added 100mg Sitagliptin to my prescription whilst keeping Gliclazide at 320mg. I think they misunderstood me as saying that the Gliclazide alone was not enough, but I wanted to see if it helps anyway.
I started Sitagliptin Sunday without Gliclazide. This is both see what effect the new medication has itself, and because if the two helped each other then I could gradually add Gliclazide to avoid hypos from starting on the maximum dose.
However last night I did not sleep well, feeling very nauseous. Though today has been better, I have still felt generally unwell with moments of nausea. I feel sure this because of the medication as, having been shielding since the lockdown started, it cannot be anything someone passed to me.
Because nausea is listed as a common side effect, I was wondering whether anyone with experience of it can say whether this is a permanent or one that goes away after an initial period? And does it normally occur when taken alongside Gliclazide? The information leaflet lists side effects for different combinations, but nausea is only lasted for when taken with Metformin, it is not included in the section where it is taken with a sulphonylurea as well.
And despite it initially seeming like it was having an effect, I was back to the now usual higher levels yesterday evening and today. So maybe the improved readings may have been just normal random variance, and the lower level on Monday evening seems more than I would have expected from this medication alone. Is it too early to expect to see any consistent benefit yet?
These are my readings from the past ten days for first thing in the morning and before an evening meal, the latter usually after fasting for around five hours:
Apr 20: 13.3 / 13.7 ** After having taken 320mg Gliclazide & 2g Metformin
Apr 21: 14.8 / 15.9
Apr 22: 15.6 / 14.3
Apr 23: 16.4 / 15.6
Apr 24: 13.6 / 17.9 ** After having taken just 2g Metformin
Apr 25: 14.3 / 11.7
Apr 26: 14.2 / 20.9
Apr 27: 12.7 / 6.9 ** After having taken 100mg Sitagliptin & 2g Metformin
Apr 28: 10.1 / 17.7
Apr 29: 17.5 / 18.1
That is pretty similar to how it has been for a while regardless of medication. There have been occasional single figure readings as I had on Monday evening, but these are uncommon. So thankfully have been highs much worse than the one on Sunday evening.
Thank you.