mr self destruct
New Member
- Relationship to Diabetes
- Type 1
Hi all,
I'm on a mission to find out a bit more info on something I found out about in passing. Four years ago I had my insulin regime changed from Mixtard to Novorapid, and soon after attended a carb counting course at University Hospital in Coventry. It was during one of these sessions that one of the nurses involved talked about an experiment carried out at George Eliot hospital in Nuneaton in the early Nineties. Basically, she said a control group of newly diagnosed diabetics was given extra special care (monthly check-ups, visits from a dietician, help and advice etc.), while the rest of them were left to their own devices. Apparently this trial lasted about a year, after which the same standard of care was given to all the patients, yet over time, they found that while the hba1c levels in the uncontrolled group dropped to match the control group quickly, the instances of complications (organ failure, eyesight problems, the usual etc.) in the uncontrolled group didn't change. Meaning the first year of care was critical to the long-term well being of the patients.
Can anyone shed any light on this? Does anyone else have an idea of what I'm going on about?
Cheers,
Jonny
I'm on a mission to find out a bit more info on something I found out about in passing. Four years ago I had my insulin regime changed from Mixtard to Novorapid, and soon after attended a carb counting course at University Hospital in Coventry. It was during one of these sessions that one of the nurses involved talked about an experiment carried out at George Eliot hospital in Nuneaton in the early Nineties. Basically, she said a control group of newly diagnosed diabetics was given extra special care (monthly check-ups, visits from a dietician, help and advice etc.), while the rest of them were left to their own devices. Apparently this trial lasted about a year, after which the same standard of care was given to all the patients, yet over time, they found that while the hba1c levels in the uncontrolled group dropped to match the control group quickly, the instances of complications (organ failure, eyesight problems, the usual etc.) in the uncontrolled group didn't change. Meaning the first year of care was critical to the long-term well being of the patients.
Can anyone shed any light on this? Does anyone else have an idea of what I'm going on about?
Cheers,
Jonny